Flickr photo credit: MBK (Marjie)
Standard Property insurance forms, unless properly endorsed, specifically exclude monetary losses that arise from the enforcement of building ordinances, building codes, or similar laws.
You may have carefully set a 100% Replacement Cost limit on your policy that is adequate to cover inflationary increases, but that “replacement” is to replace your building with “like kind and quality” of design and materials. Upon applying for a building permit to start repairs after a loss, you may be advised you’ll have to:
A. Tear down the undamaged portion of your building; and/or
B. Pay for the cost of that demolition to the undamaged portion; and/or
C. Replace the damaged portion (and the torn-down undamaged portion, if applicable) with construction that meets current codes, including (perhaps) such things as sprinkler and alarm systems, ADA-compliant entryways and facilities, earthquake- or windstorm-resistant construction features, etc.
None of the additional costs of such items are covered by standard, non-endorsed Property insurance forms – regardless of the Replacement Cost limit of insurance you purchased.
Insurance coverage for these items is available (for example, the Insurance Services Office, or “ISO” form that provides coverage is CP 04 05 “Ordinance or Law Coverage”). That form covers the above listed items, and a limit can be selected for each one, Coverage A, Coverage B, and Coverage C (sometimes coverages B and C share the same limit). Read more…
Photo credit: Flickr Gregor Rohrig
In the last post, we talked about insuring-to-value on a Replacement Cost basis, and about how it is advisable to insure at 100% of RC. We also introduced the concept of Property Coinsurance, which can be thought of as a “quantity discount” that gives you a better rate, provided that the limit of insurance you select meets or exceeds the coinsurance requirements you selected when arranging for your policy. Be aware, though, that to meet the requirements, the limit you select must be adequate at the time of loss – it is not enough to request a limit that is adequate on the first day of the policy.
Here’s an example: let’s say you get a professional property appraisal on your building on October 1, 2009 that says the insurable RC of your building on that date is $1,000,000. Your Property insurance policy renews on January 1, 2010, so that policy will run from 1/1/2010 to 1/1/2011. With that policy, you might be dealing with a loss that occurs on December 31, 2010 – fifteen months after the appraisal. Because your Property Coinsurance clause refers to the RC at the time of loss, if building costs were expected to be inflating at 5% a year, you should have asked for a limit of $1,062,500 (on a 100% coinsurance basis) on your 1/1/2010 renewal, to take care of the actual RC for that 12/31/2010 loss (5% inflation times 1.25 years since the appraisal = a factor of 6.25%).
Read more…
photo credit: flickr snapman
These days, most insurance against direct risks of property loss is arranged on a Replacement Cost (or “RC”) basis. The main alternative that is sometimes used is to insure property on an Actual Cash Value (or “ACV”) basis, which is defined as “Replacement Cost (at the time of loss) less Accumulated Physical Depreciation”. ACV insurance may sometimes be the only alternative available, but it should be avoided if at all possible, and understood fully if adopted.
Total losses can, and frequently do, happen. Even a relatively small fire can involve so much smoke damage, and water damage from fire suppression that the cost to make everything right equals the cost to replace the entire building and its contents. A big wind and rain storm can take off a roof, blow out windows, and soak everything so badly that a total loss occurs. One of the basic rules of risk management is “Don’t risk a lot for a little”. If your insurance program is properly designed, you can insure to 100% of your property’s RC at little or no increase in cost over skimping on Property insurance limits. Read more…
Recent Comments