Insurance news and information

Want to find yourself on the wrong end of a discrimination suit? Just ban children from playing on your association’s grounds.

That’s how a Boston-based condominium association found itself paying out a $150,000 in fines for discriminating against families with children. The settlement has the association paying $130,000 to the families in question and $20,000 in civil penalties. This lawsuit and the subsequent fallout gives us a prime example of an association over-stepping it’s bounds. In addition to restricting the ability of children to play outside, the association was accused of intimidating, threatening, and interfering with the rights afforded to it’s residents under the Fair Housing Act. This entire situation goes to show how difficult it can be at times for an association board to manage the needs and desires of all residents.

This is not the first case where an association has found itself on the wrong end of a discrimination suit. Other substantial instances involve associations in Indiana, Atlanta, Florida, and Washington. Regardless of guilt or if the discrimination was intentional or simply a bi-product of an otherwise harmless determination by the board, these situations can be costly to defend and extremely costly should you be found guilty.

Read more…

Suppose you’re a new apartment association board member. Part of your duties is to oversee some of the accounting recordkeeping. But as you’re looking over the accounts, you notice mention of payments to a repair company. You call the number – not in service. You check the address – no known case of that company ever having operations there. Yet as early as a month ago, there was a payment to that company for services rendered.

Call it cooking the books, fudging the numbers, whatever you like. Your association board is looking at a potential case of fraud. One or more of your board members may be skimming funds and manipulating the accounts in order to do so.

Read more…

Donald is a board member who owns a snow removal and landscaping business. Jan is a board member as well as the owner of an insurance agency. Every year for the past ten years the board has voted unanimously to hire Donald’s company for their landscaping and snow removal. They buy their apartment association insurance policy from Jan. And both instances could be violating the terms of the association bylaws or worse, state laws.

That’s because associations are often required if not expected to keep an arm’s-length distance between their personal businesses and that of the association. If the bylaws state that the association will entertain bids for the various services, it is in their best interests to prohibit board members from submitting bids themselves. It smacks of nepotism and can set your board up for an unsightly lawsuit, one that could be waged against the association board as a whole, as well as individual members. If you’re not insured for directors and officers risks, a lawsuit could drain both association coffers and your own bank account.  Read more…

 As an apartment or condo association, your board has to make some tough decisions. One of the toughest – what property management option to choose. And anyone who’s been put through the paces by an incompetent or untrustworthy manager understands the risk the wrong choice can be.

Take the example of Ohio-based condo association Lakewood Condominium Association, which is suing their property management group on allegations of stealing over $830,000 and allowing overdue association bills to go unpaid. The property management group is charged with, among other things, lying about the association having over $217,000 in CDs in the bank. The CDs, according to court documents, were withdrawn in January 2006, and over $378,000 in reserve funds remain missing.

Read more…